Legal Opinion
Dubin v. Board of Regents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 11, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHalpern, J.
The petitioner has been suspended from the practice of optometry for a period of one year by the Board of Regents upon a finding that he was guilty of unprofessional conduct (a) in authorizing the distribution of advertising matter containing reference to the cost of glasses and optometric services and (b) in offering discounts or inducements in connection with his practice.
The case is before us in a proceeding under article 78 to review the determination of the Board of Regents. The facts are virtually undisputed, although there are some differences between the parties as to the inferences…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bell v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Matter of Cherry v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Brown v. University of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Brown v. University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Petterson v. Daystrom Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Strauss v. University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956