Paul v. . Paul
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The judge presiding at the trial was of opinion that John F. Paul’s deed conveyed the land in controversy to Mattie Paul and the children living and in esse as tenants in common. This would have been correct if the deed had been made to Mattie Paul and her children. Tate v. Amos, 197 N. C., 161. But it was executed “to Mattie Paul and the heirs of her body by Smith Paul begotten.” The estate thus created was under the old law a fee tail special (2 Bl., 113), which our statute enlarges into a fee simple. C. S., 1734. The law is 'clearly stated in Revis v. Murphy, 172 N. C., 579, and Jones v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McIver v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Sessoms v. . SessomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Willis v. Mutual Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Smith v. . BrissonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- West Ex Rel. West v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Turpin v. . JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Morehead v. . MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Pittman v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Tremblay v. AycockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.