Legal Opinion

West Ex Rel. West v. Murphy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 1929PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

If under the fifth item of her grandfather’s will Bertie Hill acquired a defeasible fee which became absolute when she died leaving issue, the plaintiff, her son, would be deemed to have taken by descent from his mother and not as a purchaser by implication under the will. Whitfield v. Garris, 134 N. C., 24. In this event he would be estopped by his mother’s deed. Crawley v. Stearns, 194 N. C., 15. But if the devise be construed as a gift to the granddaughter for her life with remainder by implication to her son, the latter will be regarded as a purchaser and will not be denied the right to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Puckett v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Jones v. . WhichardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. May v. Lewis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Elmore v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Coddington v. . StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Henderson v. Western Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Capps v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API