Hirsch v. D'Autremont
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff, a guest passenger in an automobile driven by defendant, brought suit for injuries alleged to have been caused by the gross negligence, recklessness and intoxication of defendant. A motion for directed verdict was denied and the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. Prior to the entry of judgment on said verdict defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding such verdict, which motion was granted. Prom the judgment thereupon entered in favor of defendant, plaintiff has appealed.
In granting the motion above mentioned the court ruled that plaintiff was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union No. 55 v. SalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Layman v. HeardOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Lambert v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Tomlinson v. KiramidjianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.