Legal Opinion

People v. Moorman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Ionia. (Smith, J.) Eespondent was convicted of a violation of the pharmacy law. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

October 30, 1890, at the village of Belding, in Ionia county, James H. Kinnane, employed by the State Board of Pharmacy to prosecute violations of the pharmacy law, went into the drug-store of Spencer Bros., and asked for a half ounce of aloes and myrrh, which was furnished him by the respondent. Neither of the Spencer Bros, was present, nor was a registered pharmacist or a registered assistant pharmacist in the store, at the time this tincture was put up. A short time afterwards, and on the same day, Kinnane again went into the store, and called for an ounce-of tincture of iodine and one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. HovorkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Burroughs v. WebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Locke v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Templar v. State Board of ExaminersMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API