Legal Opinion

Aquino v. Prudential Life & Casualty Insurance

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 1, 2005No. 03 CV 5987(ADS)(MLO)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

In this action Darren Aquino, Stephanie Kulko-Aquino, and Anthony Passaro (collectively the “Plaintiffs”) bring the phrase “sue everyone” to a new level. The amended complaint lists a myriad of well-known public individuals and entities that have allegedly discriminated against the Plaintiffs. In sum, the Plaintiffs claim that they are “qualified individuals with disabilities” and thus are “entitled to goods, services, protections, equal and fair treatment, etc.”

The Plaintiffs filed this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act and…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harrison v. New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Morales v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Sherman v. BlackDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  4. Wendel v. New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Flambeau, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API