Legal Opinion

People v. Reitz

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1927No. Docket No. 1404PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

The defendant was tried upon an information charging perjury. The appeal is taken from the judgment following the verdict of conviction and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The information charged that, in an action instituted by this defendant for the annulment of his marriage to May-belle Nelson Reitz and pending in the superior court in the city and county of San Francisco, this defendant falsely testified under oath that he had never lived with his wife; that she misrepresented facts to him of which he had no knowledge at the time the marriage was contracted;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Baker v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. People v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. McKeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  4. Pueblo v. Díaz FigueroaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  5. People v. WyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API