Legal Opinion

People v. Collins

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1907No. Crim. No. 88PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment o£ the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

The information charges the defendant with assault with intent to commit rape, the charging part being as follows: “Said William H. Collins . . . unlawfully, violently and feloniously did make an assault upon one Katie Simonetti, a female under the age of sixteen years, to wit, of the age of six years, who was not then or there the wife of said William H. Collins, with the intent then and there feloniously and by force and violence to carnally know and ravish the said Katie Simonetti and accomplish with her an act of sexual intercourse against her will, without her consent and by force,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. KongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. WilmotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. VannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. People v. AleshireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API