Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1960No. Crim. 6778PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendant was convicted, in a nonjury trial, of violating section 288 of the Penal Code. The lewd and lascivious acts of which he was convicted were committed upon the body of his 8½-year-old daughter.

The only question here raised is whether the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the child to testify. Relying upon People v. Bernal, 10 Cal. 66, appellant contends that the witness did not appreciate the “nature, obligation and solemnity of an oath.” Section 1880, Code of Civil Procedure, provides that children under 10 years of age cannot be witnesses if they “appear incapable of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. People v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. LoignonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. People v. ErnstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. SiegfriedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. BiehlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API