Legal Opinion
Netherlands Insurance v. Cockman
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided October 21, 2004No. 1:03CV916PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
OSTEEN, District Judge.
On September 21, 2004, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). No objections were received by the court within the time prescribed by the statute.
The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice to the parties to litigate in the pending state court action the insurance coverage issues. The Plaintiffs motion to dispense with mediation (docket no. 30-1) is MOOT.
RECOMMENDATION BY…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. UrquizaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Motorists Commercial Mutual Insurance Company v. Kimberly Mitchell, individually and as legal guardian/next of kin of AM, a minor, Jaylin Mitchell, EDD, LLC, Lemuel Xavier Rodriguez, and Progressive Direct Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026