Legal Opinion

Davis v. Urquiza

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 2014No. COA13-1089PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where valid service of process was not made upon an uninsured motorist carrier within the applicable statute of limitations period, the trial court did not err in granting the motion of the uninsured motorist carrier to dismiss for insufficient process or insufficient service of process.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On 15 July 2009, Deaven Grey Davis, then a minor, was a passenger in a vehicle struck by another vehicle operated by Hermilo Salazar Urquiza (“defendant”). On 31 May 2012, Deaven Davis, along with her parents, Danette and Dickie G. Davis (collectively,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Lea v. GrierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Libertarian Party v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salvie v. Medical Center Pharmacy of Concord, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Powell v. KentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Dean v. RousseauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Dean v. RousseauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. N.C. State Bd. of Educ. v. MinickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API