Legal Opinion
Ford v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 1988No. 53018PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Movant had been convicted of first-degree assault, sodomy, and three counts of rape and sentenced to a total of 35 years’ imprisonment. We affirmed in State v. Ford, 677 S.W.2d 352 (Mo.App.1984).
*838In his Rule 27.26 motion, amended following appointment of counsel, movant alleged that he received ineffective assistance from his trial attorney. In addition to allegations not pertinent to this appeal, movant claimed his counsel failed to investigate several matters, failed to call…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arthur Lee Ford v. William ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Hamm v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Abbott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Webb v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989