Legal Opinion
JAY CASHMAN, INC. v. Portland Pipe Line Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 18, 2008No. Civil 07-93-P-HPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS IN LI-MINE AND RECOMMENDED DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN H. RICH III, United States Magistrate Judge.
Portland Pipe Line Corp. (“Pipeline”) moves for summary judgment in its favor on three of the five counts of the complaint filed against it by Jay Cashman, Inc. (“Cashman”). In its complaint, Cashman seeks additional compensation for dredging work it performed for Pipeline in the Portland Harbor Channel. See generally Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Defendant’s S/J Motion”) (Docket No. 27); Complaint…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Dana Blackie v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Triangle Trading Co. v. Robroy Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alex Kalpaxis v. MedRhythms, Inc., Brian Harris, Owen McCarthyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Fitzpatrick v. Teleflex, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2009
- OLD TOWN UTILITY & TECHNOLOGY PARK LLC v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON SOLUTIONS INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- WOODLANDS SENIOR LIVING LLC v. MAS MEDICAL STAFFING CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020