Legal Opinion
Pupko v. Bank of America
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1981No. Civ. 22077PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff N. Pupko’s action charged conversion—payment by defendant drawee Bank of America of three checks upon a forged indorsement. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied Pupko’s motion and granted the bank’s. Pupko appeals.
Pupko’s declaration in opposition to the bank’s motion for summary judgment set forth these facts. Mincey (dba Surf Motors) drew three checks to payee Pupko’s order and delivered them to him for value. The checks were drawn on defendant Bank of America. Pupko did not indorse any of the checks but attempted to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- CITY NAT. BANK OF MIAMI NA v. WernickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- LaRosa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Parsons Manufacturing Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ed Stinn Chevrolet, Inc. v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Henderson Brothers Stores, Inc. v. SmileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Nautilus Leasing Services, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983