Legal Opinion

Nautilus Leasing Services, Inc. v. Crocker National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 12, 1983No. Civ. 68525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Nautilus Leasing Services, Inc. (Nautilus). The cross-motion for summary judgment by defendant and appellant Crocker National Bank (Crocker) was denied. The facts in this case are not in dispute, the parties having agreed below that resolution of the issues of law by summary judgment was appropriate.

The appeal concerns a check in the amount of $35,948, issued to Nautilus by States Steamship Company (States) and drawn on States’ account with Crocker. By virtue of a setoff exercised by Crocker…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Ocean Park Bank v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Pupko v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Rosen v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall-Mark Electronics Corp. v. Sims (In Re Lee)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. City of Long Beach v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Paragon Development Enterprises, Inc. v. Redding Bank of Commerce (In Re Paragon Development Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1996
  4. Lincoln National Bank v. DworskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API