Hetrick v. Aluminum Workers International Union
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HUYETT, District Judge.
Defendant Lawrence Holley has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendant Holley argues that the statute upon which jurisdiction in this matter is based, 29 U.S.C. § 185,1 requires dismissal because he is being sued in his capacity as the President of defendant Aluminum Workers International Union, and that statute explicitly precludes money judgments against individual members of labor unions sued thereunder. Plaintiffs argue that 29 U.S.C. § 185 should be read more narrowly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Henry v. Radio Station KSANDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. General Drivers Local 961District Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Regan v. Ohio Barge Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
3Cited by1 opinion
- Larry v. Penn Truck Aids, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982