Legal Opinion
Regan v. Ohio Barge Line, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 5, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Rishe and Regan in their separate complaints have each alleged a cause of action against District 50, United Mine Workers of America (District 50) and eight named individuals as representatives of the members of District 50 (Representatives). These causes of action (fourth cause of action, Rishe’s amended complaint; third cause of action, Regan’s amended complaint) allege that the officers, agents and authorized representatives of District 50 “conspired and acted in cooperation and collusion with” the defendant companies “in that they condoned and permitted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Anthony Tomko v. Paul Hilbert and Michael KreheleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Ebinger Baking Co. v. Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers, Local 802, of the International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maddock v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Hetrick v. Aluminum Workers International UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979