Legal Opinion
Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. General Drivers Local 961
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 15, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 7290PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, District Judge.
This action arises under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, Title 29 U.S.C.A. § 185. The named respondents are General Drivers Local 961, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Central Conference of Teamsters, Central States Drivers Council, and Harry Bath, an individual. The action is entitled “Petition for Enforcement of Arbitration and Request for Injunction and Damages.”
A motion to dismiss has been filed on behalf of respondent Harry Bath, an individual. In this motion these jurisdictional issues are raised:
1. Whether an individual union member…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Protective Workers of America v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. Local 1291 of International Longshoremen's Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse Wkrs. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
- Wilson & Co. v. United Packinghouse WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sidney Wanzer & Sons, Inc. v. Milk Drivers Union, Local 753District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- Mistletoe Express Service v. Motor Expressmen's UnionDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1976
- Hetrick v. Aluminum Workers International UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979