Legal Opinion

Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 24, 2014No. Case No. SACV 12-00329 AG (JPRx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT UNIVERSAL REMOTE CONTROL, INC.’S OMNIBUS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

Defendant Universal Remote Control, Inc. (“Defendant”) moves for summary judgment on seven separate issues. Plaintiff Universal Electronics, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) opposes the Motion. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff and Defendant are competitors in the universal remote control business. *1067On March 2, 2012, Plaintiff filed this suit, alleging infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. 5,414,426 (“'426 Patent”),…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Protecht Group, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  2. Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Zoll Medical Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  3. Cascades Av LLC v. Evertz Microsystems Ltd.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Cascades AV LLC v. Evertz Microsystems, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API