Legal Opinion
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Zoll Medical Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 26, 2017No. Civil Action No. 10-11041-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge
This patent case involves automated external defibrillators (“AEDs”) and components thereof. In June, 2010, plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips, N.V. and Philips Electronics North America Corporation (collectively, “plaintiffs” or “Philips”) filed suit against defendant Zoll Medical Corporation (“defendant” or “Zoll”) for infringement of the Philips waveform patents (the ’454, ’905, ’212 and ’978 patents), self-test patents (the ’460 and ’374 patents) and CPR instructions patent (the ’785 patent). Zoll denied infringement and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Patrick J. O'COnnOr v. Robert W. SteevesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Staggers v. BecerraDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021