United States v. Brown
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DeCICCO, Judge:
The central issue in this case is whether appellant’s guilty plea to committing indecent acts with another was provident where he admitted having masturbated in his home near his sleeping niece while no one observed him. After examining the pertinent law, we conclude that his plea was improvident.
Facts
In accordance with his guilty pleas, appellant was convicted by general court-martial of committing indecent acts with his niece [D] by masturbating in her presence on divers occasions between May 1990 and June 1992, of committing indecent assaults on divers occasions on D during…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. MitchellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clemens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Trent Clemens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- United States v. SchmidtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. SchmidtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020