Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 31, 1993No. 14660PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The principal issue in this certified criminal appeal is whether the Appellate Court correctly determined that the trial court’s improper exclusion of a defense witness’ expert testimony was harmless. The defendant, Joseph Johnson, was convicted by a jury of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (3) and larceny in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-122 (a) (3).1 The Appellate Court affirmed *613the judgment of conviction. State v. Johnson, 29 Conn. App. 394, 615 A.2d 512 (1992). We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. D'AmbrosioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Booth v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Santiago v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.