Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 3, 1992No. 10360PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
This appeal concerns the trial court’s application of the rules of discovery and sanctions in a criminal proceeding. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) admitted certain identification testimony notwithstanding the state’s failure to disclose part of the basis of that identification to the defendant pursuant to his pretrial disclosure request and (2) excluded certain testimony of a defense expert as a sanction for the defendant’s failure to disclose certain discovery information pursuant to Practice Book § 769.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury could…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. WadeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. BeliveauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.