Legal Opinion
Exantus v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 9, 2008No. Civil Action 3:06-cv-1601 (JCH)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: DEFENDANT’S SUBSTITUTE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 63)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Andrevil and Annette Ex-antus (“Exantuses”), bring this action against the defendant, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”). The Exantuses entered into a homeowners’ insurance policy with Metropolitan to cover their home in Stamford, Connecticut. Subsequently, their house was destroyed by fire and the Exan-tuses submitted a claim to Metropolitan for their personal property, real property, and additional living expenses. Metropolitan made…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christopher Graham v. Long Island Rail RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Charles R. Carlton v. Mystic Transportation, Inc., Mystic Bulk Carriers, Inc., and Leonard BaldariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Traylor v. AwwaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Lee v. AIG Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Traylor v. AwwaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Sterling v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.