Legal Opinion
Exigent Technology, Inc. v. Atrana Solutions, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 22, 2006No. 2005-1338PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Exigent Technology, Inc. (“Exigent”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement to Atrana Solutions, Inc. (“Atrana”), its denial, as moot, of Exigent’s motion to vacate the grant of summary judgment and enforce an alleged settlement agreement, and its grant of attorney fees and costs. We conclude that the district court properly found no genuine issue of material fact concerning infringement and properly rejected Exigent’s Rule 56(f) motion. However, we also conclude that the district court improperly denied as moot Exigent’s motion to vacate…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Fitzpatrick v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- L & W, Inc. v. Shertech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Bancorp Services, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- The Massachusetts Institute Of Technology v. Abacus SoftwareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.