Legal Opinion

Berry v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 7, 1989No. 1 CA-SA 88-273PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

Petitioner Richard S. Berry seeks special action relief from an order holding him in civil contempt for failing to produce financial records at a judgment debtor’s examination, and from a resulting civil body attachment. This court, having sua sponte raised the issue of its subject matter jurisdiction, has concluded that it lacks special action jurisdiction to review a contempt adjudication. We therefore have transferred this special action to the Arizona Supreme Court pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.22(B).

The court of appeals has limited subject matter jurisdiction. Our…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crouch v. Justice of the Peace Court of the Sixth PrecinctCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. In Re WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Bedard v. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Van Baalen v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Herzog v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. The Docks Venture, L.L.C. v. Dashing Pacific Group, Ltd. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State Ex Rel. Neely v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. MohajerinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Lund v. DonahoeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Marriage of Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API