Legal Opinion

People v. Valenzuela

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1977No. Crim. 2964PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

Appellant was convicted following trial by jury of burglary in the first degree and four counts of robbery in the first degree, The sole contention on appeal is that the trial court prejudicially erred in failing to instruct the jury about the credibility of witnesses at the close of argument even though it had instructed the jury on this subject three days earlier, following the opening statements. For the reasons to be explained we hold that while the trial court did not prejudicially err in failing to reinstruct the juiy, it would have been the better practice to have…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. PenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People v. FrazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. ReinschreiberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Master v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. VelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. ArdoinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API