Legal Opinion

People v. Reinschreiber

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1956No. Crim. 5460PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

In a trial by jury, defendant was convicted on four counts of grand theft. He admitted an allegation of the information that he had been convicted of a felony (issuing checks without sufficient funds). He appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdicts; and that the court erred in instructing the jury, and in limiting his attorney’s argument to the jury.

Some of the facts, with reference to Count I, are: On November 2, 1954, about 10 a. m., one Steiner introduced Mr. Seoll…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. StecconeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. WoolsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. People v. KrupnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. In Re WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API