People v. Vela
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEST, J.
“Once penetration has occurred with the female’s consent, if the female changes her mind does force from that point (where she changes her mind) constitute rape?”
On this appeal we must determine the answer to the above question and the effect of the trial court’s failure to provide the jury with the correct answer.
Defendant, then 19 years of age, was charged with the forcible rape of Miss M., then 14 years of age, the alleged rape occurring during the eve ning hours of November 20, 1982, near Bakersfield, California. The testimony of Miss M., together with other prosecution…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. StanworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BunyardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.