Shetina v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This is the second appeal by the employer in this workmen’s compensation case and the only question of law now involved is whether there was legally competent evidence to sustain the finding of the board that the final receipt given by the claimant on October 7, 1929, was not only founded upon a mistake of fact but also procured by improper conduct upon the part of the employer’s representatives.

If there was such evidence, the judgment of the court below, entered on February 4, 1935, upon the award of compensation by the board and here appealed from, must be affirmed.

W…