Legal Opinion

Berkstresser v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1940No. Appeal, 96PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

By the Act of April 13, 1927, P. L. 186, amending the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, P. L. 736, as amended in 1919, (Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642), section, 413 which gave the board power to review, modify or reinstate compensation agreements and awards on proof that the disability of an injured employee had increased, decreased or recurred, etc., was modified so as to provide, “Except in the case of eye injuries, no agreement or award shall be reviewed, or modified, or reinstated unless a petition is filed with the board within one year after the date of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reichner v. P. Blakiston's Son & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Shetina v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Shetina v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Zavatskie v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Lowdermilk v. LorahSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dobash v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Wahs v. Wolf (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Hamer v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Harrison v. Alden Park Manor ApartmentsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Federoff v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API