Legal Opinion

Barron-Gray Packing Co. v. Kings-Land

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 12, 1948No. 9634PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This is a proceeding under R. S. Section 4915.1

It is agreed by both parties in the case that the sole question presented by this appeal is whether the successful opposer in a Patent Office trade-mark opposition proceeding is an indispensable party to a subsequent § 4915 action brought in the District Court against the Commissioner of Patents alone after the Commissioner had denied registration of the applicant’s mark on the ground of confusing similarity to the opposer’s registered trade-mark.

• The trial court dismissed the proceeding on the ground that the successful…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Speed Products. Co., Inc. v. Tinnerman Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  2. Tomlinson of High Point v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Alexandrine v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  4. Thorne, Neale & Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gardel Industries v. Kingsland, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. Gold Seal Co. v. SawyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
  3. Gold Seal Co. v. MarzallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Lanolin Plus Cosmetics, Inc. v. Botany Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  5. New Wrinkle, Inc. v. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API