Old Charter Distillery Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
Defendant seeks to have plaintiff enjoined from prosecuting the “Columbia” action because defendant is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; and if said suit is permitted to proceed “there is a threat that it will be deprived of its property without due process”. Defendant contends the real controversy between the parties could be more equitably determined in this court under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. It is tacitly conceded that “Old Charter” is not sold by plaintiff, nor does plaintiff’s name appear…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Milwaukee Gas Specialty Co. v. Mercoid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Georgia Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Alexandrine v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Lockhart v. Mercer Tube & Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
- Coates v. EllisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Bamdad Mechanic Co. v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Culbertson v. MIDWEST URANIUM COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1955
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Dictograph Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1946