Legal Opinion

Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance v. Holden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1929No. Docket No. 111, Calendar No. 33,950PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

From its organization in 1901 to September, 1925, E. A. Holden was secretary and treasurer of plaintiff company, had general management subject to the approval of the president, possessed the confidence of the directors, and was the dominating figure in its affairs. The company wrote farm fire insurance, designating the risks as classes 1 and 2. In 1920, under a law of 1919, it began to write mercantile and other risks as class 3, Harold P. Holden was made superintendent of agents, a force of solicitors and reviewers of risks was built up, and approximately $3,000,000 of class 3 business was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Spencer & Barnes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Quinn v. Quinn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State Mutual Rodded Fire Insurance v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Michigan National Bank v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Pergament v. FrazerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
  3. Veeser v. Robinson Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Baker v. Hellner Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Fill Buildings, Inc. v. Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API