Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Quinn Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. Docket No. 38PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne; Tappan, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Margaret M. Quinn against the Quinn Manufacturing Company on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The plaintiff’s action against the defendant is based upon a promissory note, dated December 31, 1913, for $7,000, signed “Quinn Manufacturing Co., S. A. Quinn, Treas.,” purporting to have been given to Mrs! K. E. Hughes, the mother of plaintiff, who indorsed it to the plaintiff. It was the claim of the plaintiff that she was the bona fide holder of the note; that her husband, S. A. Quinn, as treasurer of the defendant company, and acting for the company, executed the note in favor of Mrs. Hughes, who regularly indorsed it and transferred it to her, and that the entire transaction was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Knight v. Alamo Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Vermont Marble Co. v. SpaffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Michael v. KircherMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Vogtman v. Merchants Mortgage & Credit Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1935
  3. Veeser v. Robinson Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Baker v. Hellner Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance v. HoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API