Legal Opinion

Michigan National Bank v. Hill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1914No. Docket No. 140PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Kalamazoo; Stewart, J. Bill by the Michigan National Bank against Sarah H. Hill and others to foreclose certain mortgages. From an order overruling a demurrer to complainants’ bill, defendants Sarah H. Hill and William E. Hill and Company appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling defendants’ demurrer to a bill in chancery filed by complainant to foreclose six different mortgages, given by William E. Hill and Sarah H. Hill, and for an accounting upon matters connected therewith. Defendant Anthony S. Hill did not appear in said suit. *8Defendants Sarah H. Hill and William E. Hill Company appeared and interposed a demurrer, the essence of which is that the bill is multifarious, because it attempts to foreclose several mortgages on several distinct pieces of land given by different persons at different times and for different…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Torrent v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Robinson v. De Luxe Motor Car Co. of New JerseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Kerr v. RuppMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Case v. LongyearMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance v. HoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hieber v. Oakland CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API