Legal Opinion

Balliet v. Wollersheim

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WÍCKHEM, J.

The defenses in this case were, (1) alteration of the instrument; and (2) fraud in its procurement. The second defense was disposed of by the jury’s findings adversely to defendant and is.not involved upon this appeal.

The facts are as follows : On May 5, 1939, Louis Lohmann owned a half interest in an oil and gas lease of premises in Clay county, Tennessee. He had paid $250 for this half interest. The gas lease was not registered as a security with the department of securities, state of Wisconsin, nor had any application for registration been made therefor. In April, 1939, Lohmann…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trustees of American Bank v. McCombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  2. Elias v. WhitneyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
  3. First Nat. Bank of Miami v. BoslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Saxon v. McGillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. SFC Acceptance Corp. v. SpainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API