Balliet v. Wollersheim
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WÍCKHEM, J.
The defenses in this case were, (1) alteration of the instrument; and (2) fraud in its procurement. The second defense was disposed of by the jury’s findings adversely to defendant and is.not involved upon this appeal.
The facts are as follows : On May 5, 1939, Louis Lohmann owned a half interest in an oil and gas lease of premises in Clay county, Tennessee. He had paid $250 for this half interest. The gas lease was not registered as a security with the department of securities, state of Wisconsin, nor had any application for registration been made therefor. In April, 1939, Lohmann…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trustees of American Bank v. McCombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Elias v. WhitneyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
- First Nat. Bank of Miami v. BoslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Saxon v. McGillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- SFC Acceptance Corp. v. SpainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968