Legal Opinion

Trustees of American Bank v. McComb

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 14, 1906PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Orange county, 'in an action of debt. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiffs .assign error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The principal question involved in this case is whether or not the plaintiffs in error, who were the plaintiffs in the court below, are holders in due course of the negotiable note sued on,, of which the following is a copy:

“123.50 Int.
“$4,020.
“Orange, Va., Feb’y 29, 1904.

'“Sis months after date I promise to pay to the order of myself four thousand and twenty dollars. Negotiable and payable at the American Bank of Orange, Orange, Va.

“Homestead and pll other exemptions waived by the maker and each.endorser.
“Value received. Payable with interest.
“Lelia Moore McOomb.”

The note was endorsed in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Wickham & Goshorn v. Lewis Martin & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1856
  3. Chapman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Shurtz v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  5. Williams v. Lord & RobinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Douglass v. KoontzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bankers Trust (Delaware) v. 236 Beltway Inv.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  3. Reese v. Wampler Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  4. Fleshman v. BibbSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  5. Taylor & Co. v. Nehi Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API