Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Miami v. Bosler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1929No. Appeal, 121PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The First National Bank of Miami, Florida, brought suit, in its own name, upon three notes; the trial judge, being of opinion that they were not negotiable instruments, proffered leave to amend, so that the suit would be in the name of the payee to plaintiff’s use; the offer was rejected; a nonsuit was entered which the court in banc refused to set aside; and plaintiff now appeals. The judgment is right.

The first note, which was duly signed by defendants, is as follows:

“$2187.50 Miami, Florida, March 16,1925 “......On or before eighteen months after date, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Story v. LambMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Whitwell v. WinslowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Goss Printing Press Co. v. Daily States Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burns Mortgage Co. v. FriedSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Balliet v. WollersheimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. New Miami Shores Corp. v. DugganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  4. Burns Mortg. Co. v. FriedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
  5. Ashcraft v. BreamDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API