District of Columbia v. Humphries
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on a motion by the appellee to dismiss the appeal upon the groundvthat the transcript of record was not filed within the time prescribed by Rule XIV of this court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alvey
The motion is to dismiss the appeal. In the first instance, the motion was made by the appellee, Elizabeth M. Humphries, the plaintiff below, to docket and dismiss the appeal under Rule XIV of this court, upon the ground that no transcript of the record had been filed here within the forty days prescribed by that rule. But this court being advised that the subject of the exception taken by the appellant, the District of Columbia, was still under consideration by the court below, and not then settled, action of *70this court was deferred upon that motion. And before action had upon that motion, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Root v. SherwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Labar v. . KoplinNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- State v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacKett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Vogel v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Shults Bread Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Vogel v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937