Legal Opinion

Shults Bread Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 26, 1928No. Docket Nos. 20652,20653Published

It is within the discretion of the board to grant additional time to the respondent for filing his answer. Petitioner's motion to vacate the order granting additional time and for judgment by default, denied.

1Opinion of the Court

SHULTS BREAD CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Shults Bread Co. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 20652,20653.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

10 B.T.A. 268; 1928 BTA LEXIS 4161;

January 26, 1928, Promulgated

It is within the discretion of the board to grant additional time to the respondent for filing his answer. Petitioner's motion to vacate the order granting additional time and for judgment by default, denied.

William C. Sullivan, Esq., R. F. Garrity, Esq., and Leon F. Cooper, Esq., for the petitioner.

P. C. Alexander, Esq., and Arthur H. Murray, Esq., for the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Blair v. Oesterlein MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Hunnicutt v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. United States v. BreitlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API