Legal Opinion

Labar v. . Koplin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1851PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The first point made by the appellants is that the judge who presided at the trial erred in refusing a nonsuit. According to the practice of the English courts, a plaintiff can not be nonsuited on the trial against his assent, but may insist on the cause going to the jury, and thus take his chance of a verdict. (Grah. Pr. 2d ed. 311, and the cases there cited.) With us, however, a plaintiff may be compelled to be nonsuited on the trial, when the evidence offered by him is clearly insufficient to support his action, there being then no question of fact to be decided by the jury. This power of…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. MacKett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Porret v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Fleishman v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Duffy v. VogelNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API