Legal Opinion

Rhiannon Tanaka v. University of Southern California Michael Garrett Daryl Gross Pacific-10 Conference National Collegiate Athletic Association

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 7, 2001No. 00-55046PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a former collegiate soccer player may pursue her federal antitrust challenge to an intercollegiate athletic association rule that discourages student-athletes from transferring to member institutions during the course of their collegiate athletic careers.

I

A star high school soccer player, Rhiannon Tanaka (“Tanaka”) was heavily recruited by the athletic programs of a number of universities, including the University of Southern California (“USC”), which belongs to the Pacific-10 Conference (“Pac-10”). The Pac-10 is an association of ten…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. John MacKey v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community Hospital, Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Todd v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. National Hockey League Players' Association and Anthony Aquino v. Plymouth Whalers Hockey ClubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Rick-Mik Enterprises, Inc. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Worldwide Basketball and Sport Tours, Inc. v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API