Rhiannon Tanaka v. University of Southern California Michael Garrett Daryl Gross Pacific-10 Conference National Collegiate Athletic Association
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a former collegiate soccer player may pursue her federal antitrust challenge to an intercollegiate athletic association rule that discourages student-athletes from transferring to member institutions during the course of their collegiate athletic careers.
I
A star high school soccer player, Rhiannon Tanaka (“Tanaka”) was heavily recruited by the athletic programs of a number of universities, including the University of Southern California (“USC”), which belongs to the Pacific-10 Conference (“Pac-10”). The Pac-10 is an association of ten…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- John MacKey v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community Hospital, Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Todd v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- National Hockey League Players' Association and Anthony Aquino v. Plymouth Whalers Hockey ClubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Rick-Mik Enterprises, Inc. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Worldwide Basketball and Sport Tours, Inc. v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.