Legal Opinion
In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 2011No. 10-35206PublishedCited by 368 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
661 F.3d 417 (2011)
In the Matter of ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF PORTLAND IN OREGON, as Successors, a Corporation Sole, DBA Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon,
Father M; Father D, Appellants,
v.
Various Tort Claimants, Appellee.
No. 10-35206.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 4, 2011.
Filed September 21, 2011.
Amended November 7, 2011.
Natalia Yegorova, Black Helterline LLP, Portland, OR, for appellants Father M and Father D.
Erin K. Olson, Law Office of Erin Olson, P.C., Portland, OR, for appellee Various Tort Claimants.
Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, CARLOS T.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by368 opinions
- Nativi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- United States v. Maurice SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Schreib v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Columbia Legal Services v. Stemilt Ag Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Jonathan Hunsaker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
363 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.