Legal Opinion

McClure v. Scates

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1902No. 11,983PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Seward district court; Vm. Easton Hutchison, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

In the trial of a contested election in Seward county, the contest court determined that T. A. Scates, who claimed the the office of county attorney, had not been elected. Scates immediately prepared and presented to the contest court a bill of exceptions for settlement and to be signed when settled, but the judges of the contest court separated without taking any action, and Scates then brought this proceeding in mandamus to compel the settling and signing of a bill of exceptions. One of the judges, O. S. Kilgore, answered that he was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carney v. NeeleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Nissen v. International BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. State ex rel. Shea v. CockingMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Braine v. City of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Bailey v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API