Legal Opinion

Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1968No. 44,932PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action to enjoin a Watershed District and the individual members of its board of directors from putting into operation the proposed method of financing the General Plan of improvement on the ground that it is alleged to be unlawful. If the method of financing was held to be lawful the petition sought mandamus to force the holding of an election on such method of financing only.

The trial court sustained the Watershed District’s motion for summary judgment as to the method of financing, and ordered the Watershed District to pay…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corporation v. McHenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Ablah v. EymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Kittredge v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Long v. CulpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hawkinson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. National Education Ass'n of Shawnee Mission, Inc. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Ruthrauff, Administratrix v. KensingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Hess Construction Co. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API