Legal Opinion
Fromer v. Boyer-Napert Partnership
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided November 19, 1990No. File 509836PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurns, J.
The plaintiff in this matter is appealing a decision of the Waterford conservation commission (commission) granting a permit to the defendant BoyerNapert Partnership to conduct a regulated activity on premises known as 166-166R Parkway South in Waterford. The plaintiff, who had filed a notice of intervention pursuant to § 22a-19 (a) of the General Statutes at the hearing conducted by the commission, has standing to prosecute this appeal. Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation Commission, 212 Conn. 710, 715, 563 A.2d 1339 (1989). Such intervening party may raise only environmental issues.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paige v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Fromer v. Boyer-Napert PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- East Greenwich Oil Co., Inc. v. Kenney, Pc95-5901 (1996)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Foley v. Administrator, No. Cv94 0542297 (May 21, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Fromer v. Commissioner of Dept. of Env., No. Cv 00 0499825s (May 1, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.