Legal Opinion

Panah v. State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 29, 2020No. 5:14-cv-00166Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOOMAN PANAH, 11 Case No. 14-00166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. DISMISS CLAIMS AS UNTIMELY; 13 DENYING MOTION FOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF SANCTIONS; SETTING BRIEFING 14 SCHEDULE ON REMAINING CORRECTIONS AND CLAIMS 15 REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 16 (Docket. Nos. 162, 163) 17 18 Plaintiff, an inmate on death row at California’s San Quentin State Prison 19 (“SQSP”), filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging unconstitutional 20 acts by SQSP correctional…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API