Legal Opinion

Browder v. Belleque

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 6, 2007No. 07-35165Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Donnie Browder appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. On de novo review, Fields v. Calderon, 125 F.3d 757, 759-60 (9th Cir.1997), we affirm.

1. To the extent that Petitioner raises arguments previously rejected by this court in Browder v. Belleque, 216 Fed. Appx. 646 (9th Cir.2007) (unpublished decision), those arguments are foreclosed.

2. To the extent that Petitioner challenges the Board of Parole’s 2003 order denying his administrative appeal, we are barred from reviewing that order because of the “procedural default…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Stevie Lamar FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Richards v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Browder v. BellequeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API