Legal Opinion

Mayor & Aldermen of Lowell v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 7, 1921PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Two petitions, filed in the Superior Court respectively on October 26, 1909, and on January 26, 1910, for the appointment of commissioners relative to the abolition of grade crossings of the highway with the railroad at Middlesex Street and at Fletcher Street and Western Avenue in Lowell. The proceedings in the Superior Court and material findings of the commissioners are described in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Two petitions, filed in the Superior Court respectively on October 26, 1909, and on January 26, 1910, for the appointment of commissioners relative to the abolition of grade crossings of the highway with the railroad at Middlesex Street and at Fletcher Street and Western Avenue in Lowell. The proceedings in the Superior Court and material findings of the commissioners are described in the opinion. By order of Lawton, J., decrees were entered denying motions to recommit the reports, awarding compensation to the commissioners for their services and dismissing the petitions. The petitioners…

1Opinion of the CourtJenney, J.

The mayor and aldermen of the city of Lowell present appeals from decrees entered in the Superior Court relating to the decisions of commissioners appointed in that court to decide whether the security and convenience of the public require the abolition of certain crossings at grade in. that city, and further, if it is decided that such abolitions ought to be made, to prescribe the manner and limits thereof, to apportion the work and the payment of the actual cost of the alterations.

The petitions were filed on January 26, 1910, under St. 1906, e. 463, Part I, §§ 29 el seq. Commissioners,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Commonwealth v. Inhabitants of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  4. Woodruff v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. RagleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Kirby Lumber Co. v. ScurlockTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Town of GreenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API